The problem The rollout finishes. The behavior doesn't change.
You invest in a change: a new leadership team, a reorg, AI across the workflow. The project hits its milestones. Then the team slowly slips back into the way it has always worked, because nobody measured how it worked in the first place. By the time anyone notices, the budget is spent and no one can say why the change didn't stick.
How it works One team. One goal. Three steps.
01
See how your team works today.
Everyone takes a six-minute Culture Baseline, anchored to one business goal you name. The coach, the leader and every team member also say how confident they are in that goal and which obstacle they think matters most — where those don't match is usually where the work starts. Results the same day.
02
See what's in the way.
The baseline names the specific hurdles between how the team works and what the goal needs. Your coach works on those instead of guessing.
03
See whether it changed.
Two-minute pulses every eight weeks show whether the team is actually working differently, and whether the goal is moving.
Cut decision time on architecture trade-offs from six weeks to two.
TeamRidgeline · Platform Eng + Product
Prepared byYour coach
Responses9 of 9 · 6 min each
Instrument36 value pairs · voice survey
ReportCB-0412 · Snapshot
02 · How this team is wired
Ridgeline decides by consensus.
This team wants clarity and predictability — and it gets there through people. Nearly every voice is sought before a call is made. That's why there's almost no rework and almost no resentment, and why a decision takes six weeks. That instinct is a strength, and reaching this goal doesn't ask the team to give it up.
Collaborate 43%Command 13%Eng ↔ Product gap 0.62
● team today ⊕ what this goal needs · 9 individuals, never named Note how short that gap is, and that it runs sideways. Two or three value pairs out of thirty-six. The team stays in its own quadrant — it just stops needing the whole group to close.
03 · What you'll run into
Three hurdles between this team and two weeks
Each one is read from two places at once: how the team is wired, and what the team told us. Where both agree, it's already happening. Where one fires alone, it hasn't hit yet.
H1
Nobody is allowed to end a discussion.
Both sources agree
Your wiring
Command sits at 13%, and Decisiveness vs Deliberate decision making is this team's number-one conflict value. You're split on whether anyone should make the call.
Your team says
5 of the 7 who answered the open question named "no one is allowed to end a discussion" as the single biggest obstacle.
What it costs — Streamlining the process won't touch this. A team that believes the obstacle is permission will wait for permission, no matter how few stakeholders are left in the loop.
H2
Your two leads aren't solving the same problem.
Both sources agree
Your wiring
The two leads sit in opposite quadrants — Product in Collaborate, Engineering in Competence. The widest separation on this team.
Your team says
The two leads are 3 points apart on confidence and name different obstacles entirely.
What it costs — Two instruments found the same fracture from opposite directions. Until those two agree on what's broken, every fix gets half-implemented.
H3
Moving faster will feel like losing your voice.
Forecast — hasn't hit yet
Your wiring
Seeking consensus and Seeking input from others are core values at 9-of-9 and 8-of-9 agreement. Harmony is core too — this team avoids confrontation.
Your team says
Confidence the goal is reachable sits at 4.3 of 10. They don't yet believe it's possible.
What it costs — Name a decision owner without framing it, and this team reads it as being cut out — and its instinct is to go quiet rather than argue. Same change, scoped to a class of decisions instead of a person's status, lands completely differently.
04 · Where this goes
The fastest way to lose your voice is to take six weeks.
A team that can't close eventually has the decision made for it by someone who stopped waiting. Deciding faster is how this team protects what it values — which is the only version of this change that survives after the coaching ends.
That's the starting point, not the report. The coach works the two confirmed hurdles and watches the third. Here's the team sixteen weeks and two pulses later.
The team still decides together. Now it decides faster.
Movement from baseline to sixteen weeks and two pulses later
What moved
Before
After
Note
Decision time on architecture trade-offs
6 weeks
3 weeks
Target is 2
"No one is allowed to end a discussion" named as the biggest obstacle
5 of 7
2 of 7
Hurdle 1
The two leads name the same top obstacle
No
Yes
Hurdle 2
Confidence the goal is reachable
4.3 of 10
6.4 of 10
Hurdle 3, the forecast
How the team is wired
Collaborate
Collaborate
Command share 13% → 16%
Partway there, on purpose. Real change is incremental. The team kept its instinct and added a way to close.
Illustrative sample using a composite team. Individual responses are never shown to managers or leadership. Team-level reporting begins at five responses — below that, results are shared openly with the team and the coach, and everyone is told before they answer.
Why it's different Knowing the people helps. Knowing how the team operates is different.
Personality and leadership assessments help you understand individuals. CultureCamp shows the team they create together: how it decides, where it pulls apart, and what it does under pressure.
A team, not a headcount. The two to about 50 people who actually work and decide together. Larger organizations run several teams and roll them up.
Two sources behind every finding. How the team is wired, and what the team says. When both point the same way, you can act on it.
A second read, not a one-time report. Pulses show whether anything actually moved.
How CultureCamp compares
Question
Individual assessments e.g. Hogan, DiSC, 360s
Engagement surveys
CultureCamp
What it measures
Each person's traits or reputation
Satisfaction and engagement across a department or company
How one team actually works together and decides
Unit
One person
Hundreds of people rolled into one score
A team of 2 to about 50
Tied to a business goal
No
Rarely
Yes. Every baseline starts from one goal.
Shows change over time
Usually a one-time snapshot
Usually annual or quarterly
Two-minute pulses between sessions
Who uses it
The coach or HR
HR
The coach and the team's leader, together
How you start Start with one team and one goal.
You don't need a company-wide culture initiative. Pick the team whose change matters most right now, and the goal it's working toward. Expand to more teams if it's worth it.
CultureCamp's AI keeps the picture current between sessions. Your coach and your leaders make the change.
Mechanics and confidentiality What actually happens, and what stays private.
Mechanics
The Culture Baseline assessment takes six minutes per person
Results are ready the same day
Built to measure a team, not a headcount. Two people to about 50. Larger organizations run several teams and roll them up into an org view — the tiers below price the whole company.
Between-session pulses are three to eight questions, two minutes
You get: a team Culture Baseline, an individual report for each participant, and a leadership view tied to your goal
This isn't another engagement survey. It goes to one team, not the whole company. It's three to eight questions every eight weeks, about two minutes. The questions are tied to the goal this team chose, and the results come back to the people who answered them — not just upward.
Confidentiality
✓
Each participant sees their own individual results
✓
Managers and leadership see team-level patterns, not individual responses
✓
Pulse responses are reported in aggregate, never attributed
✓
CultureCamp is not a monitoring tool: no message reading, no activity tracking, no productivity surveillance
✓
If your company doesn't continue after month three, you choose whether your data stays in the system for later or is deleted
Pricing Your first three months are included in your coaching engagement.
Solo
$20/mo
or $200/yr — 2 months free
1 person · individual leadership engagement
Team
$200/mo
or $2,000/yr — 2 months free
Up to 25 people · most coaching engagements
Org
$500/mo
or $5,000/yr — 2 months free
26–200 people · cross-functional alignment
Enterprise
$1,000/mo
or $10,000/yr — 2 months free
201–500 people · full-org change engagements
Compare all plans
CultureCamp plans for companies
Plan
People
Monthly
Annual
Solo
1
$20
$200
Team
Up to 25
$200
$2,000
Org
26–200
$500
$5,000
Enterprise
201–500
$1,000
$10,000
Annual plans include two months free. Custom plans are available above 500 people. Your first three months are included in your coaching engagement.
This is the platform. Your coach sets their own fees for the coaching itself — those are separate from this subscription, and they'll walk you through both at kickoff.
Claire is included at every tier. Custom tiers above 500 people available — talk to us.
Your first three months are included in your coaching engagement. Your coach sets up your team, runs the Culture Baseline, and works the data with you—the platform is part of what they're already delivering. From month four, your company continues on its own subscription: monthly, or annual for two months free. Your coach walks you through it at kickoff, so there's no surprise invoice. If you decide not to continue, you choose whether your data stays in the system in case you subscribe later, or is deleted.
Method Built on the Schneider Culture Model.
Refined through years of executive and team coaching. The goal isn't to label your team. It's to show what's true today, what the business needs next, and where the gap sits.
Get started You'll own the same outcome. You just won't be guessing.
Nothing about your accountability changes. What changes is that the variable deciding it becomes visible — early enough to act on, and clear enough to show the people you report to that the organization moved, not just that the project shipped.